How one city learned to love congestion pricing

Our planet is altering. So is our journalism. Sustain with the newest information on our Local weather and Setting web page.

Sign up here to get this text in your inbox each Thursday. 

This week:

• How one city learned to love congestion pricing
• The Massive Image: Excessive-speed rail for Canada
• Ought to gas-powered leaf blowers be banned?

How one city learned to love congestion pricing

Automobiles go underneath a camera-based toll assortment system for automobiles crossing the inside city limits on the primary day of full-time operation in Stockholm, Aug. 1, 2007. (Bob Sturdy/Reuters)

Think about, if you’ll, that your city is proposing a payment for vehicles to enter the downtown core, with costs being the steepest throughout rush hour — the thought being that it’ll assist put a cease to bumper-to-bumper site visitors and make your city transfer higher. Would residents be all for it? 

Unlikely. 

However what if it labored? Do you suppose individuals would change their minds? 

Properly, that is precisely what occurred in Stockholm within the early 2000s.

City council determined to conduct a trial run, putting in a congestion cost, after which have individuals vote on whether or not or not they wished to hold it in place.

“At the time, this was seen as, you know, like a suicide idea. Who would ever do this?” mentioned Jonas Eliasson, director of transport accessibility on the Swedish Transport Administration, who led a staff that did the modelling and analysis of the pricing forward of the trial, which was launched in January 2006. 

“We had something like maybe 60, 70 per cent of public opinion against congestion pricing for all the usual reasons: it will never work, it’s unfair, car drivers have to drive,” he mentioned. “But then it was introduced, and even to my surprise, I must say, it worked even better than we thought.”

The city did some planning forward of time, buying greater than 100 buses, including 16 new bus routes, and constructing park-and-ride services, overlaying a roughly 35 sq. kilometre space.

It was a wild success. Visitors within the space dropped way over Eliasson and his staff had predicted — 20 per cent.

Eliasson mentioned that, comparatively, a vacation that falls on a weekday reduces site visitors by roughly 10 per cent.

Buses moved so properly that schedules had been modified in order that drivers weren’t left ready on the finish of the route for lengthy durations of time till their subsequent run. Massive logistics firms altered their supply scheme as a result of they may ship extra parcels than they may earlier than.

Conversely, revenues had been 10 per cent decrease than estimated as a result of the congestion pricing merely labored so properly at discouraging drivers to enter the city core. However that was okay: it wasn’t put in place to generate income.

Later evaluation discovered that high-income people, who drove extra, had been affected greater than low-income people, and that younger and low-income individuals benefitted from decrease transit fares.

Protesters from the Swedish Car Affiliation maintain a banner warning of the congestion cost in the course of the trial interval in 2006. Initially, there was widespread opposition to the cost. (Pontus Lundahl/Pressens Bild/The Related Press)

After the trial run, congestion pricing was paused within the lead-up to the referendum. What occurred? Visitors congestion went again to the best way it had been. 

The consequences had been clear, tangible and residents appreciated it; the city improved. 

The referendum handed by a big margin.

Since then, public transport has elevated whereas automobile site visitors is a bit decrease than in 2006, Eliasson mentioned.

The congestion pricing was put in place completely in 2007. It has lowered carbon emissions by roughly two to three per cent, Eliasson mentioned. It is also helped reduce pollution in the inner city by 10 to 15 per cent. 

Different research in cities like London and Milan have discovered related reductions. 

May this work in a city like Toronto, which final 12 months was ranked by a navigation software program firm as the worst traffic in North America and the third-worst in the world?

“Congestion charging works … especially if we can use the funding and the money that’s generated to pay for alternatives,” mentioned Matti Siemiatycki, professor of geography and planning and the director of the Infrastructure Institute on the College of Toronto. 

But it surely wants to be carried out in tandem with issues like a rise in public transportation, he mentioned. For instance, the Better Toronto Space is including the Eglinton Crosstown mild rail transit line, Metrolinx’s Ontario Line and expanding GO Transit services.

“We’re in the midst of the biggest transit investment in a generation,” he mentioned.

In the meantime, Eliasson mentioned that in Stockholm, congestion pricing is not even a controversial topic anymore; it is extra akin to speaking about velocity limits or site visitors alerts.

“You don’t think so much about it,” he mentioned.

— Nicole Mortillaro

Previous problems with What on Earth? are right here. The CBC Information local weather web page is right here. 

Try our podcast and radio present. In our latest episode: When some climate-conscious Swifties learned that Canada’s largest fossil gas financier, RBC, is an official associate for Taylor Swift’s Eras tour in Vancouver and Toronto, they jumped into motion. However can uniting Swifties on-line translate to change? Or is it a pattern that can fizzle over time? In the meantime, What On Earth youth columnist Aishwarya Puttur breaks down why social media campaigns are on the rise for Gen Zs.

What On Earth31:10The competition attempting to flip Swifties into local weather crusaders

What On Earth drops new podcast episodes each Wednesday and Saturday. You’ll find them in your favorite podcast app, or on demand at CBC Hear. The radio present airs Sundays at 11 a.m., 11:30 a.m. in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Reader suggestions

What to do together with your pumpkin after Halloween? Mine is one of many Toronto neighbourhoods which have a “pumpkin parade” within the native park — neighbours line up and light-weight their carved jack-o’-lanterns by the lots of. It is a showcase of creativity and a magical sight. The city gives bins to guarantee they may all get composted on the finish of the evening. This is a photograph from a previous occasion:

(Emily Chung/CBC)

We might like to hear about native initiatives that make YOUR neighborhood a little bit greener. Write us at whatonearth@cbc.ca. (And be at liberty to ship photographs too!)

Write us at whatonearth@cbc.ca. 

Have a compelling private story about local weather change you need to share with CBC Information? Pitch a First Particular person column right here.

The Massive Image: Excessive-speed rail in Canada

The federal authorities is predicted to transfer forward with plans for a high-speed rail line that may hyperlink Montreal and Toronto, as CBC reported this week. Whereas skeptics generally argue Canada is just too unfold out for high-speed rail, the graphic beneath exhibits how the world served by the road is analogous by way of each inhabitants density and distance to these already in operation in France, Italy and Spain. For extra on the proposed rail line, take a look at this story. 

— Benjamin Shingler

Scorching and bothered: Provocative concepts from across the internet

Ought to gas-powered leaf-blowers be banned?

Gasoline-powered leaf blowers with two-stroke engines are highly effective emitters. Working one for half-hour is equal to driving a Ford F-150 Raptor from Texas to Alaska, says environmental legislation professor Mark Nevitt. (Elena Efimova/Shutterstock)

Mark Nevitt describes the views on his stroll or bike to work in Atlanta as “stunningly beautiful” thanks to the city’s lush tree cover. 

However when autumn arrives, not solely do the timber shed their leaves, there’s one other seasonal change the Emory College environmental legislation professor says he’d reasonably do with out. 

“My beautiful bike ride to Emory’s campus was really punctuated and made really unpleasant by gas-powered leaf blowers,” Nevitt mentioned in an interview with What on Earth. “That is what led me down this rabbit gap of trying into their climate harms.” 

The frequent gas-powered leaf blower has a two-stroke engine, says Nevitt. Which means it cranks out more air pollution than a high-performance pickup truck, in accordance to 2011 knowledge from Edmunds. 

Nevitt mentioned he was outraged when a bill was passed in the Georgia senate final 12 months that seeks to prohibit the state’s cities and counties from banning gas-powered leaf blowers. 

“We’re seeing a powerful lobby of landscape companies that are actually pushing back against this,” mentioned Nevitt. “[They] make quite a lot of claims about the transition costs … as you move from gas to electric.” 

In Canada, there is a related dialogue about banning two-stroke gas-powered blowers. In Vancouver, the West Finish grew to become the primary neighbourhood in Canada to ban them in 2004. Final October, Westmount in Montreal additionally banned the blowers. And Toronto City Council made the choice to transition to zero-emissions out of doors energy tools in July 2023, and can conduct a web based survey subsequent month to collect suggestions from residents and companies about how the transition will unfold.

In cities like Calgary, nonetheless, the ban continues to be within the proposal stage.  A neighborhood group referred to as Challenge Calgary launched a petition that had greater than 2,800 signatures towards its purpose of three,000 on the time this text was revealed.

Nevitt says that the majority different makes use of of two-stroke gasoline engines, together with in cars, have been phased out. 

Joe Vipond, an emergency medication doctor in Calgary and past-president of the Canadian Affiliation of Physicians for the Setting, says leaf blowers pose issues for each the setting and well being. 

“The things that come out of the exhaust of a leaf blower is a combination of the combustion products, like the carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and that particulate matter 2.5, which is the real bad pollutant that people know about.” 

“In the event you use it for one hour, the quantity of smog-forming air air pollution is analogous to driving a sedan for 1,750 kilometres,” he mentioned, citing knowledge from the California Air Sources Board.

Each Vipond and Nevitt additionally say that regulation of those gadgets is an fairness and social justice difficulty. 

“The people most exposed to the pollutants and to the noise from these machines are the people that work with them every day,” mentioned Vipond. “And these are generally low-income people who are the least able to avoid these risks.”

The sound produced by leaf blowers that run on gasoline causes immense hurt, says Nevitt. “Just being exposed to [it] can [cause] permanent hearing loss.”

When it comes to local weather work, individuals usually resist change until a viable various is obtainable, says Vipond. However, with the supply of efficient electrical leaf blowers — each plug-in and battery-powered, “there’s really no reason to have gas-powered leaf blowers.”

Sheldon Ridout is the proprietor of The Silent Gardener, an all-electric landscaping firm in B.C. (Molly Segal/CBC )

Sheldon Ridout is the proprietor of The Silent Gardener, a B.C.- based mostly all-electric landscaping firm. When it first began 24 years in the past, the corporate used solely unpowered tools, similar to rakes and brooms.

“Unfortunately … on larger sites, that gets to be a lot more difficult,” mentioned Ridout. 

Round 10 years in the past, Ridout started utilizing lithium-battery tools, and all the firm’s instruments are actually powered by lithium batteries. 

“All those little myths about, ‘Oh, I’d have to have so many batteries and they only last for 15 minutes, and they’re not powerful’ … are all 10-year-ago problems,” mentioned Ridout. 

However Ridout is opposed to municipalities banning gas-powered blowers. 

“If you’re pounding on someone to do something, you’re going to get a lot more resentment,” mentioned Ridout. 

As an alternative, Ridout says that to result in change, residents want to advocate for it as shoppers. 

“That’s your quickest change.” 

— Catherine Zhu

Keep in contact!

Thanks for studying. Are there points you need us to cowl? Questions you need answered? Do you simply need to share a form phrase? We might love to hear from you. E-mail us at whatonearth@cbc.ca.

Sign up here to get What on Earth? in your inbox each Thursday.

Editors: Emily Chung and Hannah Hoag | Brand design: Sködt McNalty